Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Bourne Supremacy -- poor filmmaking?

  1. #1
    Inactive Member TJ_the_director's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 3rd, 2004
    Posts
    131
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Who else here thinks The Bourne Supemacy was ruined by the choices the filmmaker made? I just "watched" it on DVD. Ugh. Almost unwatchable. Truly God-awful editing style.

    Jerky cameras. (steadycam broken?)
    Poor continuity. (no script supervisor?)

    They filmed/edited it MTV style -- there might have been an interesting story filmed at cool locations, but who cared? I didn't. Shakey cameras and ultra-quick edited clips of mismatched continuity shots from locations seemingly selected at random does not make a good film or does it? Apparently reviewers loved this turkey. How about you?

    <font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ December 14, 2004 01:17 AM: Message edited by: TJ_the_director ]</font>

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member miker's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 16th, 1999
    Posts
    2,621
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    i've not seen it and don't care to see it either.

    Hill Street Blues has a lot to answer for.

  3. #3
    Inactive Member TJ_the_director's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 3rd, 2004
    Posts
    131
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I hear you. With NYPD Blue winding up their final season, perhaps tripods, or at least decent steadycams, will come back in fashion! [img]cool.gif[/img]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •