-
December 14th, 2004, 05:12 AM
#1
Inactive Member
Who else here thinks The Bourne Supemacy was ruined by the choices the filmmaker made? I just "watched" it on DVD. Ugh. Almost unwatchable. Truly God-awful editing style.
Jerky cameras. (steadycam broken?)
Poor continuity. (no script supervisor?)
They filmed/edited it MTV style -- there might have been an interesting story filmed at cool locations, but who cared? I didn't. Shakey cameras and ultra-quick edited clips of mismatched continuity shots from locations seemingly selected at random does not make a good film or does it? Apparently reviewers loved this turkey. How about you?
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ December 14, 2004 01:17 AM: Message edited by: TJ_the_director ]</font>
-
December 14th, 2004, 06:39 AM
#2
Senior Hostboard Member
i've not seen it and don't care to see it either.
Hill Street Blues has a lot to answer for.
-
December 15th, 2004, 04:50 PM
#3
Inactive Member
I hear you. With NYPD Blue winding up their final season, perhaps tripods, or at least decent steadycams, will come back in fashion! [img]cool.gif[/img]
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks